I received this book for free from agency review pitch, publisher request pitch in exchange for an honest review. This does not affect my opinion of the book or the content of my review.
NOW A MAJOR MOTION PICTURE
#1 NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER
A thrilling tale of betrayal and revenge set against the nineteenth-century American frontier, the astonishing story of real-life trapper and frontiersman Hugh Glass
The year is 1823, and the trappers of the Rocky Mountain Fur Company live a brutal frontier life. Hugh Glass is among the company’s finest men, an experienced frontiersman and an expert tracker. But when a scouting mission puts him face-to-face with a grizzly bear, he is viciously mauled and not expected to survive. Two company men are dispatched to stay behind and tend to Glass before he dies. When the men abandon him instead, Glass is driven to survive by one desire: revenge. With shocking grit and determination, Glass sets out, crawling at first, across hundreds of miles of uncharted American frontier. Based on a true story, The Revenant is a remarkable tale of obsession, the human will stretched to its limits, and the lengths that one man will go to for retribution.
Based on a real life story about Glass who gets mauled by a mama Grizzly Bear and left for dead by two others. A harrowing tale of revenge and survival, this will have most people on the edge of their seats.
I went into this with a ton of enthusiasm. Read fifty percent of the book and didn’t want to DNF it, so I skimmed the rest of the story. My main problem was it was told in an expository way and normally if it’s a fantasy novel I would love it, but it wasn’t and I grew so achingly bored. I didn’t care about the entire back-story of these side characters, I didn’t want to stop the momentum of what was happening to Glass by some side character’s past. I grew impatient and decided I couldn’t read at my normal pace, but since this is a review book I wanted to know how the book ended differently than the movie. I actually ended up preferring the movie ending because the book ending was just not my cup of tea. It didn’t have the same grittiness and desperation as the movie. Of course the movie also had his son which was non-existent from the book, so that added another layer of retribution to Hugh Glass’ character.
The book provides incredibly detailed back-stories about each character. All happening before Glass’ arduous journey. The survival aspects are similar to the young adult novel Hatchet by Gary Paulsen. There were some elements like eating snakes, Buffalo bone marrow, Buffalo calf and even dogs that made me a little nauseous. The fight scene with the bear was incredibly well detailed. Obviously there was a ton of scenes and whole chapters cut from the movie, but in the book it works so well. How every problem gets fixed, only to have another one stonewall Glass. It seemed way more realistic.
Whether you watch the movie, or read the book, you’re going to want to delve into Glass’s story of survival and obsession.
The differences in the movie are vastly different. We have the same main story-line, but obviously in films, there’s only ever going to be one main focus. And that was Glass getting his revenge. The key difference is that Glass is married to a Native American and has a son with her. After being mauled by the grizzly bear, he realizes his son has been murdered by the same men who have left him for dead. And on his journey to recovery, he gathers what’s left of his strong will and determination to survive and seek his revenge.
I loved the grizzly bear scene. It was exactly how Punke wrote it and to see it appear on the screen made it seem so real. The whole time my mouth was probably open. It was gruesome and the sounds were just awful. Knowing that it’s not real is the only thing that kept me from spewing up my lunch. I loved the pacing for the movie too. Glass encounters several people like he did in the book. I also preferred the movie’s ending than the book’s ending. It didn’t seem as open-ended and we finally get closure.
Movies will get rid of all detail because one gets to see everything all once, and the movie becomes a bare-bones plot. Leonardo DiCaprio acted well and I truly believed he deserved his Oscar for that performance. He had hardly any lines, but his facial expressions conveyed every emotion.